Digital Law
Trademarks: Cybersquatting and Domain Names

Please use the following links to review materials regarding the class discussion of the topic.

Cybersquatting Presentation - Headlines

WIPO Decisions of Merit
Aspen Grove, Inc. v. Aspen Grove
Finding of reverse hijacking and complaint filed in bad faith, per Rule 15e

Societe des Produits Nestle S.A. v. Pro Fiducia Treuhand AG
Family name used by Respondent in domain name; no bad faith because domain name not associated with immediate use; Complainant used proceedings in bad faith attempt to reverse hijack domain name.

Internet Jurisdiction, by Christopher Wolf
http://profs.findlaw.com/netjuris/index.html

Counsels' Domain-Name Pains, by Ritchenya A. Shepherd
http://www.law.com/

What Court Did and Did Not Do to Regulate the Net, by John T. Aquino
(focus only on cybersquatting part)
http://www.law.com/

Anticybersquatting Law Flexes Muscle as Bankruptcy Tool, Thomas Scheffey
The Connecticut Law Tribune
http://www.law.com/

New Domain Arbitration Rules Get Results, by John Caher
New York Law Journal
http://www.law.com/

Domain Names and Trademarks: At the Intersection, by Jessie N. Marshall
http://www.isoc.org/isoc/whatis/conferences/inet/96/proceedings/f4/f4_3.htm

Title 3 of Public Law 106-113
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
http://www.harveymortensen.com/courses/digitallaw/cybersquatting/pl-106-113-titleiii.pdf
(Full Public Law)

Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, by ICANN
http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm